Viewing entries tagged
Congress

Comment

Examining the Corporate Transparency Act’s Impact on Charities and Nonprofits

BACKGROUND

The Corporate Transparency Act (the “CTA”) was enacted by Congress in 2021 to combat illicit financing activities, such as the use of shell companies for money laundering and tax evasion.  Effective January 1, 2024, the CTA adds new requirements for company reporting, beneficial ownership disclosure and compliance with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”).

REQUIREMENTS

The CTA mandates that corporations, limited liability companies and limited partnerships created or registered to do business within the U.S. (“Reporting Companies”) disclose identifying information of their beneficial owners to provide increased transparency into their control structures. Reporting Companies must provide FinCEN with a report detailing company information, and also listing their beneficial owners and the ownership percentage each individual holds (where applicable). Specifically, FinCEN defines “beneficial owners” as individuals who own or control at least 25% of the ownership interests of a Reporting Company or who exercise substantial control over such a company, meaning having the authority to appoint or remove senior officers or a majority of directors of a company, having the power to direct, determine, or influence critical decisions made on behalf of the company, or holding position or exercising authority of a president, chief financial officer, general counsel, chief executive officer, chief operating officer, or any other officer who performs similar functions.  For each beneficial owner, the Reporting Company must submit the following information: (i) full legal name; (ii) birthdate; (iii) home address; (iv) an identifying number from a driver's license, passport, or other approved documents; and (v) an image of the approved document that contains that identifying number. 

 

IMPACT ON NONPROFITS

FinCEN provides for 23 exemptions to the CTA requirements, among which include tax-exempt entities described under Internal Revenue Code 501(c), as well as certain Section 527 organizations, charitable trusts, and taxable for-profit subsidiaries wholly owned by a tax-exempt entity. 

Nonprofits who have submitted their Form 1023 applications and whose tax-exempt status is pending are also exempt from reporting requirements under the CTA.  However, nonprofit organizations which are not tax-exempt, and do not intend to apply for recognition of tax exemption with the IRS, are not exempt from the reporting requirements.  Differing opinions exist regarding whether a nonprofit in the process of submitting their Form 1023 application, but has not yet submitted their application, is exempt from the CTA.  Additionally, entities which have their tax-exempt status revoked by the IRS must also submit a beneficial ownership information report within 180 days of losing their tax-exempt status. 

Moving forward, all organizations, including nonprofits, should carefully review all key provisions of the CTA to ensure compliance with the CTA’s transparency standards.  

This blog is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. This article, or contacting Bergman and Allderdice, does not in any way form an attorney-client relationship. Speak to a licensed attorney if you need help or advice navigating legal issues of the Corporate Transparency Act. If you have any questions or would like to learn more, please contact us at info@b-alaw.com or visit our website at www.b-alaw.com.

Comment

Comment

Friday Five: February 26, 2016

Friday Five: Five Useful Articles for February 26, 2016

It’s been an eventful February in the nonprofit world—the death of Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia, ongoing laws being proposed and passed in state legislatures, and, of course, the ever-closer April 15 deadline for annual tax filings.

Here are five links to help you through the cold (Okay, cold for those of you in the northern half of the country. We live in L.A. We’re only dimly aware of this thing called “weather”):

• The inimitable Gene Takagi at NEO law group has a set of 5 helpful fundraising tips for nonprofit organizations:

http://goo.gl/lQQONN

• The conservative blog The Federalist highlights some potential problems with Donald Trump’s veterans charity donations:

http://goo.gl/RHytHz

• The Nonprofit Quarterly is not impressed with Facebook’s new “Facebook for Nonprofits” site. (ED—One small disagreement w/ Nonprofit Quarterly: based on personal experience, some nonprofit orgs are not up to date with Facebook pages, and will probably find the page useful—G.M.)

http://goo.gl/VMZAmR

• JDSupra Business Advisor illuminates the additional scrutiny that Congress is bringing to colleges’ large endowment funds:  

http://goo.gl/WmJQB8

• Finally, the creators of thatswhatshesaid, a new one-woman show which extensively quotes other recent plays, are duking it out with play publisher Samuel French over fair use Arts administrator Howard Sherman has an interesting and balanced look at the case:

http://goo.gl/fQJhPA

Written by Erin Pike and Courtney Meaker, thatswhatshesaid, critiques the female character descriptions in the ten most produced plays of 2015, but it’s constructed entirely from quotations from those ten plays, and used without the playwrights’ permission. * Samuel French sent a cease-and-desist letter; the actress and director are fighting back.

Got non-profit questions? Send them our way at info@b-alaw.com, or call us at (213) -736-5101. And remember to follow us on twitter @bergmanalldlaw for more updates!

_______________________________________________________________________________

*The concept of fair use allows a creator to quote other works for purposes of ‘criticism,’ but there isn’t a whole lot of straightforward precedent to rely on in general, and particularly with this case.

Comment